How To Search Google Scholar For Systematic Review

We take seriously this concern.

How to search google scholar for systematic review. We conclude that whilst Google Scholar can find much grey literature and specific known studies it should not be used alone for systematic review searches. Macros in Microsoft Word have been developed to convert syntaxes between databases and interfaces almost automatically. To search the full text of these articles enter your query as usual in the search box.

However variable retrieval of content due to regular updating of Google algorithms and the individuals search history and location means that search results are not necessarily reproducible and are therefore not in keeping with replicable search methods required by systematic reviews. Google Scholar provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly literature. I searched PubMed in the most amusingly obvious way.

I advice you to use databases like WebofScience or Scopus for example and use Google Scholar. This video shows a few tips and tricks for how to find academic literature using Google Scholar. By combining keywords with Boolean operators and appropriate use of parentheses it is possible to construct search queries of arbitrary complexity.

Google Scholar is a useful tool for finding research literature. Within systematic reviews when searching for relevant references it is advisable to use multiple databases. Embase MEDLINE including Epub ahead of print Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar.

Search across a wide variety of disciplines and sources. Contrary to Gehanno et als conclusions that GS could even be used alone 16 we found that GS was not up to the required search standard for systematic reviews. Hello For my systematic reviews I often use Google Scholar more as a secondary source.

Optimal searches in systematic reviews should search at least Embase MEDLINE Web of Science and Google Scholar as a minimum requirement to guarantee adequate and efficient coverage. If used in systematic reviews for grey literature we recommend that searches of article titles focus on the first 200 to 300 results. Conclusion The coverage of GS for the studies included in the systematic reviews is 100.